Brutality on land and at sea: my Baltimore Sun oped
www.baltimoresun.com/news/opinion/bs-ed-israel-gaza-20100602,0,4100031.story
baltimoresun.com
Brutality on land and at sea
Israeli attack on aid ship an extension of its illegal occupation of Gaza
By Laila El-Haddad
June 2, 2010
Early Monday, Israeli navy commandos attacked a flotilla of humanitarian aid destined for the occupied Gaza Strip in international waters. The ships were carrying 10,000 tons of humanitarian supplies that are banned from Gaza under Israel’s directives, including toys, wheelchairs, athletic equipment and medicines.
The multinational aid convoy to Gaza included a former U.S. ambassador, a U.S. Navy veteran and 10 other U.S. citizens. The Memorial Day massacre left nine people dead and dozens more injured.
The Freedom Flotilla comprised six ships and carried hundreds of civilian “adversaries,” as an Israeli naval lieutenant speaking to Army Radio put it, from more than 40 countries. They had come together to challenge Israel’s asphyxiating siege of the occupied Gaza Strip.
This is a siege against 1.6 million stateless people — approximately half of them under 18 — who are largely refugees of the 1948 war. They are being blockaded by land, by air and by sea and granted only the right to remain silent in the face of such unfathomable oppression. It is a situation unprecedented in modern history.
This is a siege that has prevented my children and me from visiting Gaza, my home, for more than three years, though I am a Palestinian national.
This is a siege that killed 19-year-old Gaza resident Fidaa Talal Hijjy, who was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s disease in 2007 and was unable to travel to get the bone marrow transplant she so desperately needed.
This is a siege that prevents children’s books from reaching Gaza City’s largest library, forcing them to resort to smuggling books —yes, smuggling — via Gaza’s intricate network of tunnels. A siege that we as American taxpayers support with our involuntary contribution of roughly $500 annually for each man, woman and child in Israel.
Recent statistics from an umbrella of aid organizations are sobering: 70 percent of Gaza’s population survives on under $1 a day, and nearly half the population is unemployed. Two-thirds of the population is food insecure, and an equal percentage of babies are anemic. And all this is happening largely in the dark, quite literally: After fuel restrictions, there are now up to 12-hour rotating electricity outages.
These figures are not the result of a natural disaster. They were created through careful planning of a purposeful and sustained policy of punishment. Contrary to what U.S. and Israeli envoys to the U.N. have said, mechanisms to deliver aid to Gaza are a sham. Imports are less than 1 percent of what they were before, and allowable exports are nearly zero. More importantly, Israel crafts a weekly list of hundreds of items it forbids from the Gaza Strip. As congressman Keith Ellison discovered on a fact-finding trip to Gaza last year, this list at times included lentils and pasta.
As the occupying power, Israel is obliged to ensure the free and unimpeded passage of humanitarian relief to Gaza without advancing political objectives. Instead, Israel, with the support of the Middle East Quartet (the U.S., the U.N., the European Union and Russia) and the complicity and complacency of many regional and foreign governments, has been deliberately withholding basic necessities in what one Israeli government advisor referred to as the “Gaza diet.”
“It’s like an appointment with a dietitian. The Palestinians will get a lot thinner but won’t die,” explained Dov Weisglass, a spokesman for former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
But in the end, this siege has never been merely about food, as shocking as the statistics may be. Gaza cannot be read as merely a humanitarian case. It is about creating a situation of fear, insecurity, exhaustion and hopelessness where Palestinians become willing collaborators in their own imprisonment.
The bottom line is this: This attack on the aid flotilla was an act of piracy. It happened in international waters. Israel’s siege of Gaza, and its backing by the international community, is a form collective punishment that most legal scholars consider illegal, and an extension of a much longer, ongoing closure of the occupied territory going on for over a decade.
Israel continues to illegally occupy the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, denying Palestinians their rights and statehood. It has continued to control Gaza’s borders, airspace, people and population registry, while absolving itself of any legal responsibility, even after it supposedly disengaged from the territory in 2005.
So long as Israel continues to be allowed to act with impunity on the world stage, to remain unaccountable for its actions, to receive unrestricted flows of money with no strings attached (more than any country on earth) from the United States, such massacres will sadly repeat themselves.
Just last week, the U.S. Congress approved, 410-4, a request from the Obama administration for additional military aid to Israel amounting to $205 million.
When governments fail to act, then the people must. It is time for all Americans to stand united in the face of morally repugnant and illegal actions of the Israeli government, as they did in the face of apartheid in South Africa.
Laila El-Haddad, a resident of Columbia, is a Palestinian journalist and blogger from the Gaza Strip.
Copyright © 2010, The Baltimore Sun
06/03/2010 at 9:39 am
If the aid was so needed why did Hamas refuse it? They wont allow the aid in.
06/03/2010 at 7:30 pm
Almost all of the 10,000 tons of humanitarian supplies are not banned. Only a small portion of that which was to be delivered were banned goods. Israel tried to ship the rest to Gaza, and Hamas refused.
The siege is clearly intended to asphyxiate only Hamas’ (and other organizations’) ability to commit terrorist attacks. There is without question a detrimental impact on the civilian population, but if the direct intended consequences of the blockade were ‘collective punishment,’ why does Israel provide so much to the civilians of Gaza? Israel literally gives electricity to Gaza. It literally gives food and medicine to Gaza. This isn’t collective punishment.
Lastly, even if you disagree in entirety with the Blockade, Israel is legally required to stop all while their blockade is exists. The flotilla incident can therefore in no way be viewed as an act of piracy, since Israel acted out of a legal obligation (as well as a moral one to ensure that illicit smuggling was not occurring).
06/04/2010 at 6:06 pm
i don’t understand why israel is “legally required” to enforce a blockade that it instigated. laila- you probably don’t understand either. *sigh*
06/05/2010 at 2:43 pm
Israel has a right to defend itself. The reason for the blockade is to prevent more terrorists and weapons from entering Gaza. But Israel made it very clear from the beginning that the ships were welcome to dock in Ashdod, and if, upon inspection, there were no weapons or anything dangerous on board, the supplies would be sent to Gaza. But no-the people on board all the ships wanted to make a point. They wanted to stop the blockade. So even though they knew from the beginning that they would be stopped, they carried on. If what they really wanted was to only get supplies into Gaza, they would have followed instructions and not tried to go against the Israeli army/navy.